Development and Governance

Tag: Republic Day

  • Republic Day 2025: Governance or Politics?

    The Constitution of India, which is celebrated every year on the 26th of January as Republic Day, does three things: 

    ·      Firstly, it puts the people of India and the public good CENTERSTAGE in all government policy

    ·      Secondly, it delineates the moral framework for the government’s functioning, by asserting its faith in the universal values of liberty, equality, and fraternity

    ·      Thirdly it provides a template for good governance, ensuring efficiency, effectiveness, participation, accountability, responsiveness, transparency, inclusion, equity and rule of law in the day to day functioning of government and its various institutions, while encouraging all policy making and legislation to be through a consensus negotiated and arrived at by the country’s Elected Representatives

    I have made Republic Day the occasion on which I take a look at issues of governance in the country, and this time I am appalled to find that governance in its fullest sense has virtually disappeared from the Indian scene and been replaced by politics.

    When governance becomes pure politics the country is in trouble. Let me explain. 

    As outlined in the Constitution, one of the key roles of any government is to ensure equality and fraternity by enabling the DEVELOPMENT of the people in every sense of the word – by providing them with education, livelihoods, housing, health care, infrastructure, services and social security. However, when this aspect of governance is reduced to politics, we witness the unedifying spectacle of all political parties literally buying votes with tax-payers’ money by promising ever growing and increasingly unsustainable freebies before every election. As the intended beneficiaries are also the largest voter block, the party that ‘promises’ the most manages to win the election. They are feeding the poor for a day by giving them a fish (politics) and not feeding them for a lifetime by teaching them how to fish (governance). 

    If this is the politicisation of governance at the bottom level, there is an equally pernicious process happening at the top – not just in India, but globally as well. What commentators call the OCGFC (Owners and Controllers of Global Financialized Capital) are increasingly deciding the domestic and foreign policy across the world, and as the largest benefactors of political parties, the OCGFC inevitably politicise international relations.

    India won the respect of both superpowers, USA and the Soviet Union,  as a founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) which oversaw the demise of the Colonial era, and kept India out of the conflicts of the Cold War era, allowing it to work exclusively for the public good of its vast, impoverished population.  However, post-liberalisation, India has witnessed not only the privatisation of its public assets but also of its policy and decision making. Instead of non-alignment India’s foreign policy in recent years has literally fallen between two stools, precisely because it chose to protect private interests at the cost of public ones.

    ·      First, it allowed private companies to bypass the sanctions imposed by the West after the Ukraine conflict, and import vast quantities of Russian oil. (News item: Russia’s Rosneft has pledged to supply private Indian refiner Reliance with about half a million barrels of crude a day. At today’s prices, this will generate $13 billion annually for Russia). This naturally upset the US and its allies. 

    ·      Second, the ruling party in India has been vehement in its support of Israel (despite the growing distaste for its genocidal policies across the world), partly to protect the investments of another capitalist crony in Israel’s weapons and industry and port infrastructure, and partly for ideological reasons. This has thoroughly alienated India in the global South and among Arab and Muslim civil societies worldwide. In fact, India has never been so utterly marginalised in the international community as now, and even in BRICS+, of which India was a founding member, the letter ‘I’ has increasingly come to stand for Iran, rather than India. What a shame!

    *                    *                 *

    However bleak the outlook, I have great faith in the will of the Indian people, and feel that the situation is still redeemable if: both the Government and Opposition get out of their perpetual Election mode; Policy making insists on consensus rather than the confrontation that is the staple of the Indian Parliament today; and the much delayed National Census is conducted ASAP to enable informed decision-making and planning for the larger public good.  

  • Happy Republic Day: Can India ever become truly Inclusive?

    Clearly inspired by the French Revolution, the Preamble to the Constitution of India reads:

    WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:

    JUSTICE, social, economic and political;

    LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

    EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all

    FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;

    IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do

    HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.

    As it took 2 more months for India to formally become a Sovereign Republic, we celebrate Republic Day on the 26th of January every year, with a grand parade in New Delhi, usually with a foreign Head of State as Chief Guest. The entire parade, works the theme of Unity in Diversity to death, and brushes under the carpet the great dissensions, differences, divisions and disparities which plague us even 68 years later.

    This year however, the Government of India scored several own goals in the week leading up to the Republic Day. Firstly, the PM a la Marie Antoinette said in an interview, ‘They have no jobs? Then let them sell street food to survive…’. Then, in the face of gross government inaction, protesters against a movie actually stoned a school bus full of terrified children; and finally, Oxfam published its Commitment to Reducing Inequality (CRI) Index Report, which ranks not India but the INDIAN GOVERNMENT at a pathetically low 132 – all this, while the PM was exploring in Davos, ways to make India’s rich richer.

    Indian voters are said to exercise great freedom of choice each time they throw out the incumbent and bring in a new regime, which spends the first 2 years blaming the ‘legacy’ issues for its non-performance, and the last 18 months preparing to overcome its own incumbency factor before the next election. So the best time to judge a Government’s performance is in its third year – and that is why the present Government is facing severe scrutiny on every front: economic, governance and development.

    This dear reader, is why Oxfam’s CRI Index is so damning – because it measures the commitment of current governments, and this cannot be fobbed off by stories of ‘inherited’ problems, historical inequality, the caste system, the British colonial rule or whatever. This is the here and now and the present government is answerable – not its predecessors of any shape or colour.

    Interestingly, this Republic Day, the parade in Delhi had not one, but a clutch of Chief Guests – the Heads of State of ASEAN – who are in Delhi for a meeting. So how does India compare to the 5 founding members of ASEAN on the CRI Index? Let’s see…

    Country Spending on Health, Education, Social Protection Rank Progressive structure and incidence tax Rank Labour market policies to address inequality Rank Total CRI Rank
    Thailand 61 22 136 70
    Singapore 65 105 96 86
    Indonesia 121 34 114 101
    Philippines 101 80 122 104
    Malaysia 96 30 135 106
    INDIA 149 91 86 132

    Oxfam India offers blunt advice to the Government of India on how to improve its CRI ranking:

    Create an economy for all: Promote inclusive growth by ensuring that the income of the bottom 40% of the population grows faster than of the top 10% so that the gap between the two begins to close. This can be done by:

    • Promoting labour-intensive sectors that will create more jobs
    • Investing more in agriculture
    • Implementing fully the social protection schemes that exist

    Seal the leaking wealth bucket: Reduce extreme wealth and create a more equal opportunity country.

    • Tax the super-rich by re-introducing inheritance tax and increasing the wealth tax
    • Reduce and eventually do away with corporate tax breaks
    • Take stringent measures against tax evasion and tax avoidance
    • Increase public expenditures on health and education

    Bring data transparency: Produce and make available high quality data on income and wealth, and regularly monitor the measures the government takes to tackle the issue of rising inequality.

    In other words, go for INCLUSION. But does a government whose basic ethos is exclusivist and divisive, even begin to understand what inclusion means in modern development jargon, let alone devise and implement policies to bring it about in this most unequal of societies? (Who can forget Dumont’s classic definition of the species of humans in this society as Homo Hierarchicus?)

    It is time indeed to truly understand this concept in all its dimensions because it is the development phrase du jour and crops up in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, in the Smart Cities projects, and so on…

    The best explanation I have come across recently is in a World Bank Report East Asia and Pacific Cities – Expanding Opportunities for the Urban Poor. Incidentally, the Report covers the ASEAN countries mentioned above, besides China and Japan – home to the largest single city and urban agglomeration respectively. It begins with giving due credit to the East Asian countries in drastically reducing urban poverty, and any traveler there  will indeed vouch for the much better living conditions of the urban poor in East Asia, than in South Asian cities in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

    The writers of the report explain the expanding opportunities for the urban poor by consciously inclusive policies introduced by their governments.

    They identify three dimensions of inclusion:

    Economic Inclusion: refers to equitable access to jobs and income-generating activities, mechanisms of resilience to withstand shocks and removal of barriers to formal employment

    Spatial Inclusion: links equitable access to land, housing, infrastructure, and basic public services. Mobility is particularly important, given its role in connecting low-income residents to jobs, services, and amenities. Housing must be accessible, affordable and ensure good quality and safety

    Social Inclusion: relates to individual and group rights, dignity, equity, and security

    This Multidimensional Framework of Inclusion is graphically depicted in the report as under:

    Multidimensional Model of Inclusion

    What is noteworthy is that the three dimensions overlap, and government interventions cannot be designed and implemented piecemeal. We have seen the havoc caused to the environment in Gujarat in the name of ‘development’ during the last two decades, and a similar short-sighted approach to inclusion may end up as nothing more than ‘including’ India’s entire billion-plus population in an electronic, biometric database which is being regularly hacked, misused and abused.

    If the Government of India doesn’t show a greater commitment to long term investments in Education, Health and Social Protection, doesn’t introduce a more just taxation system, and doesn’t formalise the rapidly growing informal sectors of the economy and society, well then organisations like Oxfam will not keep quiet and India’s international credibility will take a further beating…

     

     

  • Happy Republic Day India

    26 January is celebrated each year in India with great pomp, pride and ceremony, as it commemorates the day independent India gave to itself, its own Constitution, crafted with love, care and pride by India’s intellectual elite of the time – almost all educated in England in the age of ‘liberal’ Fabianism.

    This idealism (with a soupçon of the French Revolution) is best reflected in the PREAMBLE which captures the very essence of the Constitution:

    WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:

    JUSTICE, social, economic and political;

    LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

    EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all

    FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;

    IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do

    HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.

    So how well are these lofty sentiments understood in the raucous India of today? Let us see…

    SOVEREIGN means putting the national interest above all else

    SOVEREIGN DOES NOT MEAN converting India into an instrument of another’s geo-political strategy

    SOCIALIST means inclusive growth

    SOCIALIST DOES NOT MEAN changing the rules of play to favour the rich

    SECULAR means separation of State and Religion, and equal respect for all religions

    SECULAR DOES NOT MEAN engineering communal violence for electoral gain, or making the minorities feel so alienated and insecure that they turn to violence themselves

    DEMOCRATIC means moving forward on a basis of consensus

    DEMOCRATIC DOES NOT MEAN seeking constant confrontation with one’s political opponents

    REPUBLIC means the people are supreme

    REPUBLIC DOES NOT MEAN that Indians who do not even live in India can decide its destiny

    JUSTICE means social, economic and political equity

    JUSTICE DOES NOT MEAN over 31.3 million cases pending in Indian courts and the consequent brutalization of over 2,80,000 unconvicted undertrials languishing in Indian jails; or the summary justice meted out by ‘khap panchayats’ (village courts)

    LIBERTY means the liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

    LIBERTY DOES NOT MEAN the banning of this book, or the censoring of that film, or the rewriting of history, or honour killings, or reconversions, or offering to ‘cure’ homosexuality…

    EQUALITY of status and of opportunity means just that

    EQUALITY DOES NOT MEAN that the top 10% hold 74% of the country’s total wealth, while the bottom 10% hold just 0.2%

    FRATERNITY means assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation

    FRATERNITY does not mean blatantly racist attacks on Indian citizens from the North Eastern states, on the streets of the national capital…

    Happy Republic Day, India!

    Let us rediscover the Constitution we gave ourselves 65 years ago…